Reciprocal Accountability Theory

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

In Nov 1979, Michael Borrero, Pricilla Martina and Gretchen Bubelman Borrero were published a book named “Toward A Theory of Accountability”. In this book, attention has been devoted to the social work literature to the notion of accountability and the reciprocal accountability theory. The focus of this literature has centered around three themes:

  • that the profession has not been accountable;
  • that the profession needs to be more accountable; and
  • some suggestions on how the profession can be more accountable.

Reciprocal Accountability Theory

A current problem with the accountability literature is that the concept of accountability is poorly and too loosely defined. In reciprocal accountability theory, we define accountability as a statement of clear intent by the service provider (agency, worker etc.) and recipient of the intended services (clients system) – and evaluation of the effectiveness and/or efficiency of the intent of both parties. This definition provides a reciprocal process of evaluation between client system and the service provider. Thus, to be accountable in this formulation depends upon a clear statement of intent by the service provider and client system and the evaluation of this intent. In brief form, this reciprocal formulation would be stated:

A = f{Ip + Ic + E}

Ip = Intent of the Service Providers (Ip)
Ic = Intent of the Service Recipients (Ic)
E = Evaluation

Link: A Brief Account of Accountability

Intent of the Service Providers (Ip):

In reciprocal accountability theory, the intent of the service providers (Ip) is comprised of a clear statement of goals, objectives, resource allocation and time. The service provider can be the agency, staff member, funding source; whomever, who attempts to clearly state what they can do; how they can do it; with what resources; and within what time period.

Goals of Ip:

Goals are statements of ideal ends to achieve if everything went according to plan or if all things were equal. Being an ideal end, goals are seldom, if ever, achieved.

Objectives of Ip:

Objectives are specific steps taken which will lead to the goal(s). They are micro activities which, when added together, would approximate the goal. “Objectives derive logically from the goal and specify the actual impact” 4 U to be made in the process of reaching the goal(s). Consequently, evaluation of objectives is a valuable activity in monitoring how closely goal(s) are being achieved.

Resource Collection of Ip:

Resource collection is the supply of money, personnel, motivation, communication, workers, commitment, etc., needed or used to reach objectives and subsequently the goal(s). Resource allocation is the input needed to reach the desired objective; it includes tangible and intangible inputs.

Time of Ip:

Time is the period believed necessary to accomplish the stated goals and objectives. Time is dependent upon the goals and objectives selected, and resource allocations to be utilized. That is, the broader the goals, the greater the number of objectives, the greater the number of resource allocations required and the greater the time needed to reach the desired results.

The intent of the Service Recipients (Ic):

In reciprocal accountability theory, the intent of the recipient of service (Ic) client system, consumer of services is also a clear statement of goals, objectives, resource allocation and time. The recipient of service can be the agency or staff member, but it is most usually the consumer of services or the client system. Here the recipients of service must clearly state what they want to be done; and what resources they are willing to invest, e.g., money, self-exploration, and within what time period. The same definition of the intent of the service provider that applied to the service provider, equally apply to the service recipient. Such as:-

  • Goals of Ic
  • Objectives of Ic
  • Resource of Ic
  • Allocation of Ic and
  • Time of Ic

Link: A Toward Theory of Accountablity

Evaluation (E):

In reciprocal accountability theory, evaluation (E) is the measurement of effort, effectiveness and/or efficiency of the intent of the service provider and service recipient.

Effort of Evaluation:

Effort refers to the assessment of program inputs, e.g., activity, money, staff, time and commitment necessary. The effort is not a measurement of outcome, it merely measures the input of activity.

Effectiveness of Evaluation:

Effectiveness is a measurement of the degree to which objectives and goals have been reached in a given time or stage of program planning or program implementation.

Efficiency of Evaluation:

Efficiency is a measurement of the ratio between effort and effectiveness. It is the means by which to accomplish specific goals and objectives with the minimum use of resources, e.g., time, money, workers, energy, etc.

Reciprocal Accountability Theory

Reciprocal Accountability Theory

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

Hits: 1046

13 Responses

  1. tigger onesie says:

    I am really glad to read this web site posts which contains lots of helpful facts, thanks for providing these kinds of statistics.

  2. Hipolito Montaivo says:

    I am really impressed along with your writing abilities as neatly as with the layout for your blog. Is this a paid topic or did you customize it your self? Anyway stay up the nice quality writing, it is rare to see a great weblog like this one nowadays..

  3. minecraft says:

    Wonderful article! We will be linking to this great post on our site. Keep up the great writing.

  4. pikachu pajamas says:

    I think this is one of the most vital information for me. And I’m glad reading your article. But want to remark on few general things, The website style is great, the articles is really excellent :D. Good job, cheers

  5. minecraft says:

    Nice post. I learn something totally new and challenging on sites I stumbleupon everyday. It’s always helpful to read articles from other writers and practice a little something from other websites.

  6. minecraft says:

    It’s awesome to go to see this site and reading the views of all mates regarding this article, while I am also zealous of getting experience.

  7. full body animal onesies says:

    I’m gone to inform my little brother, that he should also pay a visit this weblog on regular basis to get updated from latest news update.

  8. minecraft says:

    I every time used to study article in news papers but now as I am a user of web therefore from now I am using net for content, thanks to web.

  9. minecraft says:

    Great goods from you, man. I have considered your stuff previous to and you are simply too wonderful. I really like what you’ve got here, certainly like what you are saying and the best way in which you assert it. You’re making it entertaining and you still care for to keep it sensible. I can’t wait to learn much more from you. This is really a wonderful site.

  10. minecraft says:

    Ahaa, its pleasant conversation concerning this piece of writing at this place at this website, I have read all that, so at this time me also commenting at this place.

  11. free iptv says:

    Hello,nice share.

  12. Maritza says:

    I like reading a post that will make men and women think. Also, thanks for
    allowing me to comment!

  13. video games like spyro says:

    continuously i used to read smaller content that as well clear their motive, and that is also happening with this article which I am reading at this place.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *